|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Morrigan LeSante
Senex Legio The OSS
1147
|
Posted - 2016.02.02 08:05:21 -
[1] - Quote
Can a dev please, please confirm what happens if you are podded with a skill in the queue to which you have no pre-reqs.
Please.
It's been asked all over but I've never seen an answer yet.
Thanks in advance. |
Morrigan LeSante
Senex Legio The OSS
1148
|
Posted - 2016.02.02 10:48:59 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Hey guys, a small update that I'm sure many of you will be happy about:
We are going to allow you to begin training any skill which you have trained at least one skill point into previously, even if you don't meet the prerequisites.
This means those of you with skills like Command Ships grandfathered into your books just need to make sure there's one SP in there before Feb 9 and you'll be all set.
Hope this finds you well!
Fantastic news. Thanks for this fellas, removes the ambiguity of the edge cases of pause/restarts. |
Morrigan LeSante
Senex Legio The OSS
1148
|
Posted - 2016.02.02 12:46:03 -
[3] - Quote
Cyril Nethrad wrote:CCP Rise wrote:Hey guys, a small update that I'm sure many of you will be happy about:
We are going to allow you to begin training any skill which you have trained at least one skill point into previously, even if you don't meet the prerequisites.
This means those of you with skills like Command Ships grandfathered into your books just need to make sure there's one SP in there before Feb 9 and you'll be all set.
Hope this finds you well! So these people not only have the advantage of flying ships they don't have all current prerequisites for, they can even get better in doing so while still ignoring the requirements? Seems totally fair...
Yes, because we all trained it back in 2012 when there were no pre-requistes. None whatsoever.
Oh. Wait.
THEY HAD LONGER AND JUST AS CRAPPY PRE-REQS.
Simply outrageous that people who had paid the old prereqs shouldn't be unfairly treated.
How'd you like it if they ADDED the old prereqs to the new ones. You know, to be "fair"
God you over entitled green eyed little kids bug the crap out of me. |
Morrigan LeSante
Senex Legio The OSS
1148
|
Posted - 2016.02.02 14:14:19 -
[4] - Quote
Cyril Nethrad wrote:Morrigan LeSante wrote:Yes, because we all trained it back in 2012 when there were no pre-requistes. None whatsoever.
Oh. Wait.
THEY HAD LONGER AND JUST AS CRAPPY PRE-REQS. So you say Logistics IV and Heavy Assault Cruisers IV are longer trains than all four Warfare skills to V and Warfare Link Specialist to IV (which requires Leadership V)? I doubt it... (especially since most of the prerequisites for Logistics and Heavy Assault Cruisers are core skills and trained anyway).
You don't need to take my word for it.
Pay special note to the fact that an absolution and a damnation have different unlock pathways. |
Morrigan LeSante
Senex Legio The OSS
1148
|
Posted - 2016.02.02 15:22:20 -
[5] - Quote
Masao Kurata wrote:Warfare link specialist aside (which is still a prereq), those are all inoffensive core skills.
The flip side to this is that if I want to use a command ship for boosting it was EVEN worse. 100 days of training just to sit in the hull to boost from followed by months of boosting skills. You will never please everyone and the current train is faster and more relevant to hulls and more general use.
I mean logi IV is of no use whatever to me when I'm in a command ship, or indeed anything but a logi ship. Those LD skills boost you every single time you're sat in a squad leader position be you in a sleipnir, or an ibis.
Inoffensive is a matter of personal taste, really. The old requirements took longer no matter how you look at it.
Point is, claiming this change is somehow a "newbro" persecution is preposterous. Disingenuous beyond belief. |
Morrigan LeSante
Senex Legio The OSS
1158
|
Posted - 2016.02.03 08:03:17 -
[6] - Quote
People didn't really whine, they adapted, like you ***** about. Observe: http://imgur.com/3vcqqL5
What the did was seek clarification on the mechanic.
And I don't think you really get what a "carebear" is, thus I can only assume you're trolling. |
|
|
|